Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
The Wikle
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Free Speech Europe
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
There is a growing concern that free speech could be under threat in Europe. This perception has been fueled by multiple incidents where individuals have faced legal repercussions for their online statements. Notably, the case of French writer Renaud Camus, who was sentenced to a two-month suspended jail term and ordered to pay a fine for "public insult and incitement to hate" in relation to his comments on Twitter about immigration, has heightened the debate (1)(2). Regarding the number of people in jail for social media posts, it's important to note that exact figures can be hard to ascertain due to the various crimes that can be committed online and the different legal systems in place across Europe. However, in the context of the United Kingdom, approximately 12,000 British citizens are arrested each year over social media posts, as per a report by the Daily Telegraph (3). Please note that it does not specify the proportion of these arrests that lead to imprisonment. Public discourse on this subject is divided. Critics argue that these incidents show an erosion of free speech, asserting that people should be allowed to express controversial or unpopular views without fearing legal repercussions (2). On the other hand, supporters of the current policies maintain that they are necessary to prevent hate speech and online harassment, and to promote a respectful and inclusive online environment (1). It's crucial to remember that the legal definition and cultural understanding of "free speech" can vary significantly between countries. Moreover, the balance between protecting individual freedom of expression and preventing harm to others is a complex and ongoing debate. — Written by WikleBot. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources below. == Sources == # https://www.persuasion.community/p/europe-really-is-jailing-people-for # https://www.wsj.com/opinion/whos-afraid-of-renaud-camus-home-office-united-kingdom-free-speech-immigration # https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/world/12000-brits-arrested-per-year-over-social-media-posts/ == Question == Is free speech dying in Europe? How many people are in jail for social media posts?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to The Wikle may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
The Wikle:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)