Jump to content

What is the epistemic crisis?

From The Wikle
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''


The epistemic crisis
'''What is the epistemic crisis?'''
--------------------


An “epistemic crisis” is a period in which large parts of the public lose confidence that existing institutions, experts, and information channels can reliably tell them what is true. Dan Williams defines it as a breakdown in the shared rules we use “to decide which claims to believe” [7], while Arnold Kling frames it as a collapse in “common knowledge” that once under-girded political and scientific debate [6]. RAND’s Truth Decay project similarly stresses the “diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life” [4].
An “epistemic crisis” is a breakdown in the social systems that allow people to agree on what is probably true. Commentators argue that large segments of the public no longer share a common set of trusted institutions, methods or experts that can reliably adjudicate facts, which in turn weakens collective decision-making and democratic legitimacy [4][6][7]. Surveys show that confidence in government, the news media and science has declined to historic lows [3][5][14]. Empirically, the crisis is visible in the replication failures of psychology and other sciences [2][13] and in rising perceptions that politics, not evidence, drives institutional statements [1].


Across surveys, trust in government, the news media, and even science has fallen to historic lows [3][5]. Replication failures in research [2] and open disagreements among experts during the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the sense that no authority can be taken at its word [6][8]. The result, according to Nate Silver, is that “the expert class is failing” and the public no longer believes that technocrats can steer society through crises [9].
'''What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?'''


Causes of the crisis
Most writers see several interacting causes rather than a single trigger.
--------------------


# Politicization of expertise. When scientific or professional bodies take overt political stances, trust erodes—especially among those who would normally be ideologically aligned [1][16].   
* Politicization of expertise. Experiments find that when an institution takes a partisan stance, trust falls even among people who share its politics [1].   
# Proven elite error. High-profile mistakes (e.g., financial crisis forecasts, Iraq WMD intelligence, early COVID messaging) create feedback loops of skepticism [9][13]. 
* Declining reproducibility and transparency in research. The 2015 “Reproducibility Project” replicated only 36 % of 100 prominent psychology findings [2]; commentators translate this into a generalized suspicion that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [13]. 
# Low reproducibility in the sciences. The large‐scale replication study in psychology found that only ~36 % of seminal results replicated, feeding popular narratives that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [2][12].   
* “Truth Decay.” RAND describes a long-term shift in which objective facts have less influence on opinion, fueled by information overload, social media and polarization [4]
# Fragmented media ecosystems. Cable news, social platforms, and partisan outlets flood audiences with conflicting frames, while legacy media face accusations of groupthink [13][14].   
* Media homogeneity and economic pressures. Essays argue that prestige outlets increasingly move “in unison,” narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and amplifying mistakes [12][18][19].   
# Cognitive overload & motivated reasoning. RAND highlights that a 24/7 information environment pushes citizens toward heuristics—trusting in-group narratives rather than weighing evidence [4].
* Elite performance failures. Policy blunders, financial crises and pandemic missteps reduce the perceived competence of experts and thus the willingness to defer to them [8][9][15].   
* Feedback loop of distrust. Falling trust leads people to seek alternative information sources, which are often lower quality, reinforcing the cycle of doubt [16].


Examples of elite failures that fueled the crisis
'''What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?'''
-------------------------------------------------


* The replication crisis. Published failures to reproduce cornerstone psychology findings undermined faith in peer review [2][12].
Commentators point to high-profile episodes where institutional actors were later judged to have misinformed or under-performed. The list below focuses on cases repeatedly cited across the sources.


* COVID-19 messaging reversals. Shifts on masks, school closures, and lab-leak discourse were perceived as incompetence or bias by many commentators [6][9].   
* Replication crisis in psychology and biomedical research [2][13] – journals and professional societies published results that could not be reproduced, shaking faith in peer review. 
* Financial crisis of 2008 – although not detailed in the listed pieces, several authors cite it as an origin of populist backlash against economic and governmental elites [8][9]. 
* COVID-19 policy communication – Substack essays accuse health agencies and media of oscillating messages on masks, school closures and vaccine side-effects, eroding credibility [6][9][15].   
* Politicized scientific endorsements – controversies such as professional societies endorsing specific political candidates are taken as evidence that science is being leveraged for partisan goals [20]. 
* Media miscues – examples include the “Potomac plane crash” rumor mill [17], perceived ideological conformity at The New York Times [18] and NPR’s loss of cross-partisan trust [19]. 
* Intelligence and national-security assessments – while not covered in depth by the academic sources, opinion writers frame pre-war weapons claims and surveillance revelations as emblematic elite errors [7][11].


* Financial crisis of 2008. Economists, ratings agencies, and regulators failed to anticipate systemic risk, delegitimizing macroeconomic expertise [9][11]. 
'''Conflicting views and ongoing discourse'''


* Iraq War intelligence (2003). Faulty assessments on weapons of mass destruction eroded trust in both intelligence services and major newspapers that uncritically amplified them [11][14].
Not everyone accepts the “crisis” framing. Pew finds that majorities still express at least “a fair amount” of trust in scientists, even as the trend declines [5]. Boston Review warns that panic about “fake news” can itself be exaggerated and weaponized to suppress dissent [16]. Arnold Kling doubts that an epistemic collapse has truly occurred, suggesting instead that the internet merely exposes longstanding disagreements [6]. Conversely, RAND, Nate Silver and others argue the problem is real and worsening [4][9]. The debate thus centers on whether current trust levels are dangerously low or simply adjusting to a new information ecosystem.
 
* Media scandals. Controversies at The New York Times [14] and NPR [15] are cited as proof that newsroom cultures can become insular, ideological, or error-prone. 
 
* Political endorsements by scientific bodies. Critics argue that when organizations such as the AMA or scientific societies endorse candidates, they appear partisan and diminish perceived neutrality [16].
 
Timeline of the public discourse
--------------------------------
 
1958–1970s: Trust in U.S. federal government peaks at 73 % (1958) but starts a long decline after Vietnam and Watergate [3].
 
1990s: Rise of 24-hour cable news and talk radio creates segmented audiences. 
 
2003–2008: Iraq intelligence failure and Global Financial Crisis intensify scrutiny of expert judgment. 
 
2010–2015: Social media platforms scale. Science publishes the first large replication study, revealing systemic weaknesses in psychology [2]. RAND coins “Truth Decay” (2018) [4]. 
 
2020–2021: COVID-19 brings unprecedented reliance on expert guidance. Communication miscues and politicization deepen skepticism [5][6][9]. 
 
2023–2024: Pew reports record-low trust in scientists among many demographic groups [5]; commentators declare an “epistemic crisis” [6][7][9]. 
 
Conflicting views in the discourse
----------------------------------
 
* Some analysts (e.g., Yglesias [11]) emphasize elite misinformation; others (Boston Review [13]) argue that the “fake news” panic itself is overstated. 
 
* Sam Harris [10] sees the crisis largely as a problem of online disinformation, while Dan Williams [7] stresses institutional failures.
 
* Lee Jussim [12] portrays replication problems as evidence of widespread scientific unreliability, whereas the original Science replication paper urges incremental reform, not wholesale distrust [2].
 
Source Analysis
---------------
 
# Peer-reviewed preprint (political science / psychology) 
# Peer-reviewed journal article (Science, reproducibility study) 
# Survey report (Pew Research Center) 
# Policy research report (RAND Corporation) 
# Survey report (Pew Research Center) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Arnold Kling, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Dan Williams, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Dan Williams, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Nate Silver, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Sam Khan, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Sam Harris, Substack) 
# Opinion essay / commentary summarizing academic literature (Lee Jussim, Substack) 
# Magazine essay / investigative journalism (Boston Review) 
# Magazine essay / investigative journalism (The Economist) 
# Opinion essay / insider account (The FP) 
# Opinion essay / commentary (Steve Stewart-Williams, Substack)


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
Peer-reviewed Science:
# [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239561/v1 Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ''Research Square''] (2024 pre-print; Empirical research)
. [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239561/v1 Study: Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public]
# [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – ''Science''] (2015 peer-reviewed replication study)
 
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024 Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – ''Pew Research Center''] (Long-running survey report)
2. [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 Study: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science]
# [https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – ''RAND Corporation''] (2018 research report / policy study)
 
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/ Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – ''Pew Research Center''] (2023 survey report)
Data-driven Analysis:
# [https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/an-epistemic-crisis An Epistemic Crisis? – ''In My Tribe'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
 
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/americas-epistemological-crisis America’s Epistemological Crisis – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
3. [https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024 Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 - Pew Research]
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/elite-failures-and-populist-backlash Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
 
# [https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-expert-class-is-failing-and-so The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – ''Silver Bulletin'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
4. [https://www.rand.org/pubs/research%20reports/RR2314.html Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life - RAND Corporation]
# [https://samkahn.substack.com/p/its-the-epistemology-stupid It’s the Epistemology, Stupid – ''Sam Kahn'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
5. [https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/ Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline - Pew Research]
# [https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning The Reckoning – ''Sam Harris'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
 
# [https://www.persuasion.community/p/why-the-media-moves-in-unison Why the Media Moves in Unison – ''Persuasion''] (Opinion / Essay)
Investigative Journalism & Commentary:
# [https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/75-of-psychology-claims-are-false 75 % of Psychology Claims Are False – ''Unsafe Science'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Replication-crisis analysis)
 
# [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/28/jeff-bezos-washington-post-trust/ The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – ''The Washington Post''] (2024 Opinion / Op-Ed)
# [https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/an-epistemic-crisis An Epistemic Crisis? - Arnold Kling]
# [https://www.slowboring.com/p/elite-misinformation-is-an-underrated Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – ''Slow Boring''] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/americas-epistemological-crisis America's epistemological crisis - Dan Williams]
# [https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fake-news-about-fake-news/ The Fake News About Fake News – ''Boston Review''] (Long-form analysis / Essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/elite-failures-and-populist-backlash Elite failures and populist backlash - Dan Williams]
# [https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-to-know-who-to-trust-potomac How to Know Who to Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – ''Jesse Singal'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Media criticism)
# [https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-expert-class-is-failing-and-so The expert class is failing, and so is Biden’s presidency Nate Silver]
# [https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way When the New York Times Lost Its Way – ''1843 Magazine'' (''The Economist'')] (Magazine feature)
# [https://samkahn.substack.com/p/its-the-epistemology-stupid It's The Epistemology, Stupid - Sam Khan]
# [https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – ''The Free Press''] (First-person essay / Media criticism)
# [https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning The Reckoning - Sam Harris]
# [https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/should-scientific-organizations-endorse Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – ''Steve Stewart-Williams'' (Substack)] (Commentary essay)
# [https://www.persuasion.community/p/why-the-media-moves-in-unison Why The Media Moves in Unison - Yascha Mounk]
# [https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/75-of-psychology-claims-are-false 75% of Psychology Claims are False - Lee Jussim]
# [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/28/jeff-bezos-washington-post-trust/ The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media - Jeff Bezos]
# [https://www.slowboring.com/p/elite-misinformation-is-an-underrated - Elite misinformation is an underrated problem - Matthew Yglesias]
# [https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fake-news-about-fake-news/ The Fake News about Fake News - The Boston Review]
# [https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-to-know-who-to-trust-potomac How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition - Jess Singal]
# [https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way When the New York Times lost its way - The Economist]
# [https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust.]
# [https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/should-scientific-organizations-endorse Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? - Steve Stewart-Williams]


== Question ==
== Question ==

Latest revision as of 04:00, 1 May 2025

Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.

What is the epistemic crisis?

An “epistemic crisis” is a breakdown in the social systems that allow people to agree on what is probably true. Commentators argue that large segments of the public no longer share a common set of trusted institutions, methods or experts that can reliably adjudicate facts, which in turn weakens collective decision-making and democratic legitimacy [4][6][7]. Surveys show that confidence in government, the news media and science has declined to historic lows [3][5][14]. Empirically, the crisis is visible in the replication failures of psychology and other sciences [2][13] and in rising perceptions that politics, not evidence, drives institutional statements [1].

What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?

Most writers see several interacting causes rather than a single trigger.

  • Politicization of expertise. Experiments find that when an institution takes a partisan stance, trust falls even among people who share its politics [1].
  • Declining reproducibility and transparency in research. The 2015 “Reproducibility Project” replicated only 36 % of 100 prominent psychology findings [2]; commentators translate this into a generalized suspicion that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [13].
  • “Truth Decay.” RAND describes a long-term shift in which objective facts have less influence on opinion, fueled by information overload, social media and polarization [4].
  • Media homogeneity and economic pressures. Essays argue that prestige outlets increasingly move “in unison,” narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and amplifying mistakes [12][18][19].
  • Elite performance failures. Policy blunders, financial crises and pandemic missteps reduce the perceived competence of experts and thus the willingness to defer to them [8][9][15].
  • Feedback loop of distrust. Falling trust leads people to seek alternative information sources, which are often lower quality, reinforcing the cycle of doubt [16].

What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?

Commentators point to high-profile episodes where institutional actors were later judged to have misinformed or under-performed. The list below focuses on cases repeatedly cited across the sources.

  • Replication crisis in psychology and biomedical research [2][13] – journals and professional societies published results that could not be reproduced, shaking faith in peer review.
  • Financial crisis of 2008 – although not detailed in the listed pieces, several authors cite it as an origin of populist backlash against economic and governmental elites [8][9].
  • COVID-19 policy communication – Substack essays accuse health agencies and media of oscillating messages on masks, school closures and vaccine side-effects, eroding credibility [6][9][15].
  • Politicized scientific endorsements – controversies such as professional societies endorsing specific political candidates are taken as evidence that science is being leveraged for partisan goals [20].
  • Media miscues – examples include the “Potomac plane crash” rumor mill [17], perceived ideological conformity at The New York Times [18] and NPR’s loss of cross-partisan trust [19].
  • Intelligence and national-security assessments – while not covered in depth by the academic sources, opinion writers frame pre-war weapons claims and surveillance revelations as emblematic elite errors [7][11].

Conflicting views and ongoing discourse

Not everyone accepts the “crisis” framing. Pew finds that majorities still express at least “a fair amount” of trust in scientists, even as the trend declines [5]. Boston Review warns that panic about “fake news” can itself be exaggerated and weaponized to suppress dissent [16]. Arnold Kling doubts that an epistemic collapse has truly occurred, suggesting instead that the internet merely exposes longstanding disagreements [6]. Conversely, RAND, Nate Silver and others argue the problem is real and worsening [4][9]. The debate thus centers on whether current trust levels are dangerously low or simply adjusting to a new information ecosystem.

Sources[edit]

  1. Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – Research Square (2024 pre-print; Empirical research)
  2. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – Science (2015 peer-reviewed replication study)
  3. Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – Pew Research Center (Long-running survey report)
  4. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – RAND Corporation (2018 research report / policy study)
  5. Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – Pew Research Center (2023 survey report)
  6. An Epistemic Crisis? – In My Tribe (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  7. America’s Epistemological Crisis – Conspicuous Cognition (Commentary essay)
  8. Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – Conspicuous Cognition (Commentary essay)
  9. The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – Silver Bulletin (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  10. It’s the Epistemology, Stupid – Sam Kahn (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  11. The Reckoning – Sam Harris (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  12. Why the Media Moves in Unison – Persuasion (Opinion / Essay)
  13. 75 % of Psychology Claims Are False – Unsafe Science (Substack) (Commentary / Replication-crisis analysis)
  14. The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – The Washington Post (2024 Opinion / Op-Ed)
  15. Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – Slow Boring (Opinion / Essay)
  16. The Fake News About Fake News – Boston Review (Long-form analysis / Essay)
  17. How to Know Who to Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – Jesse Singal (Substack) (Commentary / Media criticism)
  18. When the New York Times Lost Its Way – 1843 Magazine (The Economist) (Magazine feature)
  19. I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – The Free Press (First-person essay / Media criticism)
  20. Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – Steve Stewart-Williams (Substack) (Commentary essay)

Question[edit]

What is the epistemic crisis? What is the cause of the epistemic crisis? What are some examples of elite failure the caused the epistemic crisis?