Jump to content

What is the epistemic crisis?

From The Wikle
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
Tag: Reverted
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''


----
'''What is the epistemic crisis?'''


== What is the epistemic crisis?  ==
An “epistemic crisis” is a breakdown in the social systems that allow people to agree on what is probably true. Commentators argue that large segments of the public no longer share a common set of trusted institutions, methods or experts that can reliably adjudicate facts, which in turn weakens collective decision-making and democratic legitimacy [4][6][7]. Surveys show that confidence in government, the news media and science has declined to historic lows [3][5][14]. Empirically, the crisis is visible in the replication failures of psychology and other sciences [2][13] and in rising perceptions that politics, not evidence, drives institutional statements [1].


Most commentators use the phrase “epistemic crisis” to describe a breakdown in the shared processes by which a society determines what is true.  Symptoms include declining trust in government, news media, scientists, and other traditional arbiters of knowledge; the spread of mutually exclusive factual narratives; and rising doubts about the reliability of expert advice or scientific findings [4][6][7][15].
'''What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?'''


The crisis is not merely about misinformation or “fake news.”  It is about the loss of a perceived ''system'' for adjudicating truth-claims—what RAND calls “Truth Decay,” the “diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life” [4].  When citizens no longer agree on who or what counts as an authoritative source, collective decision-making and long-term institutional legitimacy suffer.
Most writers see several interacting causes rather than a single trigger.


----
* Politicization of expertise. Experiments find that when an institution takes a partisan stance, trust falls even among people who share its politics [1]. 
* Declining reproducibility and transparency in research. The 2015 “Reproducibility Project” replicated only 36 % of 100 prominent psychology findings [2]; commentators translate this into a generalized suspicion that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [13]. 
* “Truth Decay.” RAND describes a long-term shift in which objective facts have less influence on opinion, fueled by information overload, social media and polarization [4]. 
* Media homogeneity and economic pressures. Essays argue that prestige outlets increasingly move “in unison,” narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and amplifying mistakes [12][18][19]. 
* Elite performance failures. Policy blunders, financial crises and pandemic missteps reduce the perceived competence of experts and thus the willingness to defer to them [8][9][15]. 
* Feedback loop of distrust. Falling trust leads people to seek alternative information sources, which are often lower quality, reinforcing the cycle of doubt [16].


== What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?   ==
'''What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?'''


Different authors emphasize different drivers, but four broad themes recur:
Commentators point to high-profile episodes where institutional actors were later judged to have misinformed or under-performed. The list below focuses on cases repeatedly cited across the sources.


# Politicization of Expertise  
* Replication crisis in psychology and biomedical research [2][13] – journals and professional societies published results that could not be reproduced, shaking faith in peer review. 
  • Institutions that once presented themselves as neutral are increasingly perceived as partisan, especially when they take explicit political stands or are staffed by ideologically homogeneous elites [1][5][20].   
* Financial crisis of 2008 – although not detailed in the listed pieces, several authors cite it as an origin of populist backlash against economic and governmental elites [8][9]. 
  • Experimental evidence shows that overt politicization reduces trust even among people who agree with the position being advocated [1].
* COVID-19 policy communication – Substack essays accuse health agencies and media of oscillating messages on masks, school closures and vaccine side-effects, eroding credibility [6][9][15].  
* Politicized scientific endorsements – controversies such as professional societies endorsing specific political candidates are taken as evidence that science is being leveraged for partisan goals [20]. 
* Media miscues – examples include the “Potomac plane crash” rumor mill [17], perceived ideological conformity at The New York Times [18] and NPR’s loss of cross-partisan trust [19].   
* Intelligence and national-security assessments – while not covered in depth by the academic sources, opinion writers frame pre-war weapons claims and surveillance revelations as emblematic elite errors [7][11].


# Declining Reliability Signals 
'''Conflicting views and ongoing discourse'''
  • Large-scale efforts to replicate influential psychology papers found that only 36-47% replicate, fuelling public scepticism about “settled” science [2][13]. 
  • High-profile retractions and methodological crises make it harder for laypeople to know which studies to take seriously.


# Information Abundance & Fragmentation 
Not everyone accepts the “crisis” framing. Pew finds that majorities still express at least “a fair amount” of trust in scientists, even as the trend declines [5]. Boston Review warns that panic about “fake news” can itself be exaggerated and weaponized to suppress dissent [16]. Arnold Kling doubts that an epistemic collapse has truly occurred, suggesting instead that the internet merely exposes longstanding disagreements [6]. Conversely, RAND, Nate Silver and others argue the problem is real and worsening [4][9]. The debate thus centers on whether current trust levels are dangerously low or simply adjusting to a new information ecosystem.
  • Digital platforms have lowered entry costs for publishing, so elite outlets no longer monopolize attention. Competing narratives flourish, and confirmation-bias is amplified by algorithms [4][12][16].
 
# Elite Failure & Eroding Trust 
  • When expert predictions or policy decisions turn out badly, citizens update their priors about elite competence.  This “performance-based” scepticism accumulates across domains—finance, foreign policy, public health, education—and eventually generalises into a cross-domain trust collapse [6][8][9][15].
 
Authors disagree on relative weight: Kling sees institutional overconfidence as central [6]; Williams stresses ideological uniformity in newsrooms and universities [7]; Yglesias highlights elite misinformation as an “underrated” factor [15]; RAND assigns equal blame to media, education, and political incentives [4].
 
----
 
== Examples of elite failures that fuelled the crisis  ==
 
* 2008 Financial Crisis 
  – Regulators, ratings agencies, and leading economists failed to foresee systemic risk, damaging confidence in economic expertise [4][9]. 
 
* Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq (2003) 
  – Intelligence community and major news outlets amplified faulty assessments, later acknowledged as error, reducing faith in both government and media [8][12].
 
* Replication Crisis in Psychology (2015-present) 
  – Landmark Science paper found fewer than half of 100 studies replicated [2]; follow-ups suggest up to 75 % of claims are false or exaggerated [13]. 
 
* COVID-19 Messaging (2020-2023) 
  – Shifting public-health guidance on masks, school closures, and vaccine transmission created perception of political rather than evidentiary decision-making [6][9][15].
 
* Media Coverage Controversies 
  – Internal critiques at NPR [19], The New York Times [18], and broader surveys show newsroom monoculture leading to groupthink and factual errors, inviting populist backlash [12][18][19].
 
----
 
== Timeline of the public discourse  ==
 
1958-1970s 
* Public trust in federal government consistently above 60 % [3].
 
1990s 
* Rise of cable news and early internet begins fragmenting audiences; trust starts to decline [4].
 
2003 
* Iraq WMD intelligence failure becomes a formative scepticism event [8][12].
 
2008-2009 
* Financial crisis leads to renewed questioning of expert competence in economics and regulation [4][9].
 
2015 
* “Replication crisis” enters mainstream after Science publishes reproducibility project [2]. 
* RAND launches Truth Decay project [4].
 
2016-2018 
* “Fake news” becomes political rallying cry; Facebook and Twitter hearings in Congress [16]. 
* Multiple think-pieces label the situation an “epistemic crisis” [6][7].
 
2020-2022 
* COVID-19 accelerates debate over politicization of science; Pew registers sharp fall in trust in scientists among Republicans and, later, Democrats [5]. 
* Substack newsletters (Silver, Harris, Singal, Khan) provide alternative venues for evaluating expert failure narratives [9][11][17].
 
2023-2024 
* Continued drop in trust in government hits new lows (Pew: 16 %) [3]. 
* Nate Silver argues the “expert class is failing,” tying institutional mistakes to electoral outcomes [9]. 
* Surveys show media credibility at or near record lows [14][19].
 
----
 
== Public discourse and fault lines  ==
 
Consensus 
* Nearly all sources agree that trust in traditional institutions is falling and that politicization correlates with this decline [1][3][4][5].
 
Contested Points 
* Cause vs. symptom: Is elite failure driving distrust, or is polarization causing elites to appear less trustworthy? 
* Remedy: Some propose re-emphasising methodological transparency and viewpoint diversity [7][17]; others focus on demand-side media literacy and algorithmic reforms [4][16].
 
----
 
== Sources  ==
 
# Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ResearchSquare pre-print (peer-review pending) 
# Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – Science (peer-reviewed journal article) 
# Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – Pew Research Center trend survey 
# Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – RAND Corporation research report 
# Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – Pew Research Center survey report 
# An Epistemic Crisis? – Arnold Kling (opinion blog post) 
# America’s Epistemological Crisis – Dan Williams (opinion essay) 
# Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – Dan Williams (opinion essay) 
# The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – Nate Silver (opinion newsletter) 
# It’s The Epistemology, Stupid – Sam Khan (opinion newsletter) 
# The Reckoning – Sam Harris (opinion newsletter) 
# Why The Media Moves in Unison – Yascha Mounk (opinion newsletter) 
# 75% of Psychology Claims Are False – Lee Jussim (opinion newsletter summarizing peer-reviewed work) 
# The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – Washington Post opinion piece (Jeff Bezos) 
# Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – Matthew Yglesias (opinion newsletter) 
# The Fake News About Fake News – Boston Review (magazine feature) 
# How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – Jesse Singal (opinion newsletter) 
# When The New York Times Lost Its Way – The Economist (magazine feature) 
# I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – The Free Press (first-person essay) 
# Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – Steve Stewart-Williams (opinion newsletter)


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
# [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239561/v1 Study: Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public]
# [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239561/v1 Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ''Research Square''] (2024 pre-print; Empirical research)
# [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 Study: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science]
# [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – ''Science''] (2015 peer-reviewed replication study)
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024 Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 - Pew Research]
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024 Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – ''Pew Research Center''] (Long-running survey report)
# [https://www.rand.org/pubs/research%20reports/RR2314.html Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life - RAND Corporation]
# [https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – ''RAND Corporation''] (2018 research report / policy study)
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/ Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline - Pew Research]
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/ Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – ''Pew Research Center''] (2023 survey report)
# [https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/an-epistemic-crisis An Epistemic Crisis? - Arnold Kling]
# [https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/an-epistemic-crisis An Epistemic Crisis? – ''In My Tribe'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/americas-epistemological-crisis America's epistemological crisis - Dan Williams]
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/americas-epistemological-crisis America’s Epistemological Crisis – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/elite-failures-and-populist-backlash Elite failures and populist backlash - Dan Williams]
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/elite-failures-and-populist-backlash Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
# [https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-expert-class-is-failing-and-so The expert class is failing, and so is Biden’s presidency Nate Silver]
# [https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-expert-class-is-failing-and-so The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – ''Silver Bulletin'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://samkahn.substack.com/p/its-the-epistemology-stupid It's The Epistemology, Stupid - Sam Khan]
# [https://samkahn.substack.com/p/its-the-epistemology-stupid It’s the Epistemology, Stupid – ''Sam Kahn'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning The Reckoning - Sam Harris]
# [https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning The Reckoning – ''Sam Harris'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://www.persuasion.community/p/why-the-media-moves-in-unison Why The Media Moves in Unison - Yascha Mounk]
# [https://www.persuasion.community/p/why-the-media-moves-in-unison Why the Media Moves in Unison – ''Persuasion''] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/75-of-psychology-claims-are-false 75% of Psychology Claims are False - Lee Jussim]
# [https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/75-of-psychology-claims-are-false 75 % of Psychology Claims Are False – ''Unsafe Science'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Replication-crisis analysis)
# [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/28/jeff-bezos-washington-post-trust/ The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media - Jeff Bezos]
# [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/28/jeff-bezos-washington-post-trust/ The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – ''The Washington Post''] (2024 Opinion / Op-Ed)
# [https://www.slowboring.com/p/elite-misinformation-is-an-underrated - Elite misinformation is an underrated problem - Matthew Yglesias]
# [https://www.slowboring.com/p/elite-misinformation-is-an-underrated Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – ''Slow Boring''] (Opinion / Essay)
# [https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fake-news-about-fake-news/ The Fake News about Fake News - The Boston Review]
# [https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fake-news-about-fake-news/ The Fake News About Fake News – ''Boston Review''] (Long-form analysis / Essay)
# [https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-to-know-who-to-trust-potomac How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition - Jess Singal]
# [https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-to-know-who-to-trust-potomac How to Know Who to Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – ''Jesse Singal'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Media criticism)
# [https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way When the New York Times lost its way - The Economist]
# [https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way When the New York Times Lost Its Way – ''1843 Magazine'' (''The Economist'')] (Magazine feature)
# [https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust.]
# [https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – ''The Free Press''] (First-person essay / Media criticism)
# [https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/should-scientific-organizations-endorse Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? - Steve Stewart-Williams]
# [https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/should-scientific-organizations-endorse Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – ''Steve Stewart-Williams'' (Substack)] (Commentary essay)


== Question ==
== Question ==

Latest revision as of 04:00, 1 May 2025

Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.

What is the epistemic crisis?

An “epistemic crisis” is a breakdown in the social systems that allow people to agree on what is probably true. Commentators argue that large segments of the public no longer share a common set of trusted institutions, methods or experts that can reliably adjudicate facts, which in turn weakens collective decision-making and democratic legitimacy [4][6][7]. Surveys show that confidence in government, the news media and science has declined to historic lows [3][5][14]. Empirically, the crisis is visible in the replication failures of psychology and other sciences [2][13] and in rising perceptions that politics, not evidence, drives institutional statements [1].

What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?

Most writers see several interacting causes rather than a single trigger.

  • Politicization of expertise. Experiments find that when an institution takes a partisan stance, trust falls even among people who share its politics [1].
  • Declining reproducibility and transparency in research. The 2015 “Reproducibility Project” replicated only 36 % of 100 prominent psychology findings [2]; commentators translate this into a generalized suspicion that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [13].
  • “Truth Decay.” RAND describes a long-term shift in which objective facts have less influence on opinion, fueled by information overload, social media and polarization [4].
  • Media homogeneity and economic pressures. Essays argue that prestige outlets increasingly move “in unison,” narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and amplifying mistakes [12][18][19].
  • Elite performance failures. Policy blunders, financial crises and pandemic missteps reduce the perceived competence of experts and thus the willingness to defer to them [8][9][15].
  • Feedback loop of distrust. Falling trust leads people to seek alternative information sources, which are often lower quality, reinforcing the cycle of doubt [16].

What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?

Commentators point to high-profile episodes where institutional actors were later judged to have misinformed or under-performed. The list below focuses on cases repeatedly cited across the sources.

  • Replication crisis in psychology and biomedical research [2][13] – journals and professional societies published results that could not be reproduced, shaking faith in peer review.
  • Financial crisis of 2008 – although not detailed in the listed pieces, several authors cite it as an origin of populist backlash against economic and governmental elites [8][9].
  • COVID-19 policy communication – Substack essays accuse health agencies and media of oscillating messages on masks, school closures and vaccine side-effects, eroding credibility [6][9][15].
  • Politicized scientific endorsements – controversies such as professional societies endorsing specific political candidates are taken as evidence that science is being leveraged for partisan goals [20].
  • Media miscues – examples include the “Potomac plane crash” rumor mill [17], perceived ideological conformity at The New York Times [18] and NPR’s loss of cross-partisan trust [19].
  • Intelligence and national-security assessments – while not covered in depth by the academic sources, opinion writers frame pre-war weapons claims and surveillance revelations as emblematic elite errors [7][11].

Conflicting views and ongoing discourse

Not everyone accepts the “crisis” framing. Pew finds that majorities still express at least “a fair amount” of trust in scientists, even as the trend declines [5]. Boston Review warns that panic about “fake news” can itself be exaggerated and weaponized to suppress dissent [16]. Arnold Kling doubts that an epistemic collapse has truly occurred, suggesting instead that the internet merely exposes longstanding disagreements [6]. Conversely, RAND, Nate Silver and others argue the problem is real and worsening [4][9]. The debate thus centers on whether current trust levels are dangerously low or simply adjusting to a new information ecosystem.

Sources[edit]

  1. Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – Research Square (2024 pre-print; Empirical research)
  2. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – Science (2015 peer-reviewed replication study)
  3. Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – Pew Research Center (Long-running survey report)
  4. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – RAND Corporation (2018 research report / policy study)
  5. Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – Pew Research Center (2023 survey report)
  6. An Epistemic Crisis? – In My Tribe (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  7. America’s Epistemological Crisis – Conspicuous Cognition (Commentary essay)
  8. Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – Conspicuous Cognition (Commentary essay)
  9. The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – Silver Bulletin (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  10. It’s the Epistemology, Stupid – Sam Kahn (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  11. The Reckoning – Sam Harris (Substack) (Opinion / Essay)
  12. Why the Media Moves in Unison – Persuasion (Opinion / Essay)
  13. 75 % of Psychology Claims Are False – Unsafe Science (Substack) (Commentary / Replication-crisis analysis)
  14. The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – The Washington Post (2024 Opinion / Op-Ed)
  15. Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – Slow Boring (Opinion / Essay)
  16. The Fake News About Fake News – Boston Review (Long-form analysis / Essay)
  17. How to Know Who to Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – Jesse Singal (Substack) (Commentary / Media criticism)
  18. When the New York Times Lost Its Way – 1843 Magazine (The Economist) (Magazine feature)
  19. I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – The Free Press (First-person essay / Media criticism)
  20. Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – Steve Stewart-Williams (Substack) (Commentary essay)

Question[edit]

What is the epistemic crisis? What is the cause of the epistemic crisis? What are some examples of elite failure the caused the epistemic crisis?