Epistemic Crisis: Difference between revisions

WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
Tag: Reverted
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''


----
'''What is the epistemic crisis?'''


'''What is the epistemic crisis?''' 
An “epistemic crisis” is a breakdown in the social systems that allow people to agree on what is probably true. Commentators argue that large segments of the public no longer share a common set of trusted institutions, methods or experts that can reliably adjudicate facts, which in turn weakens collective decision-making and democratic legitimacy [4][6][7]. Surveys show that confidence in government, the news media and science has declined to historic lows [3][5][14]. Empirically, the crisis is visible in the replication failures of psychology and other sciences [2][13] and in rising perceptions that politics, not evidence, drives institutional statements [1].


In contemporary U.​S.​ discourse the phrase “epistemic crisis” refers to a perceived breakdown in society’s ability to establish shared facts and to reward trustworthy expertise. Commentators argue that once‐reliable knowledge institutions—science, journalism, government statistics, policy analysis—now face widespread doubt, so citizens retreat to partisan or identity-based information tribes instead of evidence-based consensus [4][5][6][7][12]. 
'''What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?'''


----
Most writers see several interacting causes rather than a single trigger.


'''What is causing the crisis?'''  
* Politicization of expertise. Experiments find that when an institution takes a partisan stance, trust falls even among people who share its politics [1]. 
* Declining reproducibility and transparency in research. The 2015 “Reproducibility Project” replicated only 36 % of 100 prominent psychology findings [2]; commentators translate this into a generalized suspicion that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [13]. 
* “Truth Decay.” RAND describes a long-term shift in which objective facts have less influence on opinion, fueled by information overload, social media and polarization [4]. 
* Media homogeneity and economic pressures. Essays argue that prestige outlets increasingly move “in unison,” narrowing the range of permissible viewpoints and amplifying mistakes [12][18][19].  
* Elite performance failures. Policy blunders, financial crises and pandemic missteps reduce the perceived competence of experts and thus the willingness to defer to them [8][9][15]. 
* Feedback loop of distrust. Falling trust leads people to seek alternative information sources, which are often lower quality, reinforcing the cycle of doubt [16].


# Declining baseline trust. Long-running trend surveys show that public confidence in federal government, media, and science has fallen to historic lows [3][5][13]. 
'''What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?'''


# “Truth decay.” RAND researchers document four reinforcing drivers: cognitive biases, changes in the information ecosystem (social media, cable news), competing demands on journalism’s business model, and polarization [4].
Commentators point to high-profile episodes where institutional actors were later judged to have misinformed or under-performed. The list below focuses on cases repeatedly cited across the sources.


# Perceived politicization inside expert communities. Experimental work indicates that when institutions take visible partisan stands, even ideologically aligned citizens lose confidence [1][20].   
* Replication crisis in psychology and biomedical research [2][13] – journals and professional societies published results that could not be reproduced, shaking faith in peer review. 
* Financial crisis of 2008 – although not detailed in the listed pieces, several authors cite it as an origin of populist backlash against economic and governmental elites [8][9].
* COVID-19 policy communication – Substack essays accuse health agencies and media of oscillating messages on masks, school closures and vaccine side-effects, eroding credibility [6][9][15]. 
* Politicized scientific endorsements – controversies such as professional societies endorsing specific political candidates are taken as evidence that science is being leveraged for partisan goals [20]. 
* Media miscues – examples include the “Potomac plane crash” rumor mill [17], perceived ideological conformity at The New York Times [18] and NPR’s loss of cross-partisan trust [19].   
* Intelligence and national-security assessments – while not covered in depth by the academic sources, opinion writers frame pre-war weapons claims and surveillance revelations as emblematic elite errors [7][11].


# Reproducibility problems in flagship sciences. The 2015 Science study replicated only 36 % of high-profile psychology findings [2], a result widely portrayed as evidence that peer review alone cannot safeguard truth [14]. 
'''Conflicting views and ongoing discourse'''


# High-salience elite failures (see next section). Each conspicuous mistake furnishes vivid anecdotes that confirm the public’s priors that “experts” are unreliable [8][9][10][11][15].
Not everyone accepts the “crisis” framing. Pew finds that majorities still express at least “a fair amount” of trust in scientists, even as the trend declines [5]. Boston Review warns that panic about “fake news” can itself be exaggerated and weaponized to suppress dissent [16]. Arnold Kling doubts that an epistemic collapse has truly occurred, suggesting instead that the internet merely exposes longstanding disagreements [6]. Conversely, RAND, Nate Silver and others argue the problem is real and worsening [4][9]. The debate thus centers on whether current trust levels are dangerously low or simply adjusting to a new information ecosystem.
 
These explanations are not universally accepted. Some writers believe the main culprit is populist manipulation of social media, whereas others stress structural incentives inside elite institutions themselves [16][17]. 
 
----
 
'''Examples of elite failures that intensified the crisis''' 
 
* Public-health messaging whiplash during COVID-19 (e.g., early mask guidance that reversed within weeks), cited by Nate Silver as evidence of overconfidence and political signalling in scientific agencies [9]. 
 
* High-profile retractions and non-replicable studies in psychology, behavioral economics, and biomedicine [2][14].
 
* Media outlets misreporting the “Potomac plane crash” rescue narrative and other viral stories before verification, a pattern documented by Jesse Singal [17].
 
* The New York Times’ 2020 Tom Cotton op-ed controversy, flagged by The Economist as an example of newsroom homogeneity overriding editorial standards [18]. 
 
* NPR’s perceived loss of ideological diversity, described by a 25-year insider who argues it alienated broad audiences [19]. 
 
* Intelligence consensus on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (not in the list above but invoked by multiple authors as archetypal elite error) is frequently referenced in discussions of truth decay [4][6].
 
* Financial and political elites under-estimating the populist backlash that produced Brexit and the 2016 U.S. election, analysed by Dan Williams [8]. 
 
----
 
'''Timeline of the public conversation''' 
 
2003–2008 Early trust slide accelerates after Iraq-WMD intelligence failure and the Global Financial Crisis (cited retrospectively by Williams [8] and Yglesias [15]). 
 
2010–2013 Social-media platforms overtake newspapers as primary traffic drivers, beginning the incentives mis-alignment noted by RAND [4]. 
 
2015 Science publishes “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science” [2]; phrase “replication crisis” gains mainstream attention. 
 
2016 U.S. election popularizes “fake news,” prompting debates over platform moderation and media partisanship [16]. 
 
2018 RAND releases Truth Decay report [4]; Pew documents steep fall in Republican trust in national media [13]. 
 
2020–2022 COVID-19 policy reversals and politically freighted scientific statements intensify scrutiny of expertise [5][9][20].
 
2023–2024 Multiple journalists and scholars (Mounk [12], Silver [9], Bezos [13]) publish essays on collapsing institutional credibility; Pew finds trust in federal government hovering near all-time lows [3]. 
 
----
 
'''Points of disagreement in the sources''' 
 
* Some authors (e.g., Harris [11]) stress the moral duty of elites to defend objective truth even if it alienates partisans, whereas others (e.g., Khan [10]) argue that institutional neutrality must be restored first. 
 
* Researchers such as Cook et al. [1] emphasize measurable effects of politicization on trust, while opinion writers like Williams [6][8] foreground cultural ressentiment and class dynamics. 
 
----
 
Sources (to be expanded by the community) 
 
# Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ResearchSquare pre-print (empirical study). 
# Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – Science journal article (peer-reviewed replication project). 
# Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – Pew Research Center trend survey (longitudinal polling data). 
# Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – RAND Corporation research report (multi-factor analysis). 
# Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – Pew Research Center survey report (public opinion). 
# An Epistemic Crisis? – Arnold Kling blog post (commentary). 
# America’s Epistemological Crisis – Dan Williams essay (opinion). 
# Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – Dan Williams essay (opinion). 
# The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – Nate Silver newsletter (commentary). 
# It’s The Epistemology, Stupid – Sam Khan newsletter (commentary). 
# The Reckoning – Sam Harris newsletter (commentary). 
# Why The Media Moves in Unison – Yascha Mounk newsletter (media analysis). 
# The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – Washington Post opinion (Jeff Bezos). 
# 75% of Psychology Claims Are False – Lee Jussim newsletter summarizing peer-reviewed work (meta-research commentary). 
# Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – Matthew Yglesias newsletter (commentary with empirical references). 
# The Fake News About Fake News – Boston Review feature (magazine analysis). 
# How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – Jesse Singal newsletter (media criticism). 
# When The New York Times Lost Its Way – The Economist feature (media industry analysis). 
# I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – The Free Press first-person essay (insider account). 
# Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – Steve Stewart-Williams newsletter (normative/empirical discussion of politicization).


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
# Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ResearchSquare pre-print (peer-review pending)
# [https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3239561/v1 Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public – ''Research Square''] (2024 pre-print; Empirical research)
# Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – Science (peer-reviewed journal article)
# [https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science – ''Science''] (2015 peer-reviewed replication study)
# Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – Pew Research Center trend survey
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/06/24/public-trust-in-government-1958-2024 Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 – ''Pew Research Center''] (Long-running survey report)
# Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – RAND Corporation research report
# [https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2314.html Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life – ''RAND Corporation''] (2018 research report / policy study)
# Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – Pew Research Center survey report
# [https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/ Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline – ''Pew Research Center''] (2023 survey report)
# An Epistemic Crisis? – Arnold Kling (opinion blog post)
# [https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/an-epistemic-crisis An Epistemic Crisis? – ''In My Tribe'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# America’s Epistemological Crisis – Dan Williams (opinion essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/americas-epistemological-crisis America’s Epistemological Crisis – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
# Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – Dan Williams (opinion essay)
# [https://www.conspicuouscognition.com/p/elite-failures-and-populist-backlash Elite Failures and Populist Backlash – ''Conspicuous Cognition''] (Commentary essay)
# The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – Nate Silver (opinion newsletter)
# [https://www.natesilver.net/p/the-expert-class-is-failing-and-so The Expert Class Is Failing, and So Is Biden’s Presidency – ''Silver Bulletin'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# It’s The Epistemology, Stupid – Sam Khan (opinion newsletter)
# [https://samkahn.substack.com/p/its-the-epistemology-stupid It’s the Epistemology, Stupid – ''Sam Kahn'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# The Reckoning – Sam Harris (opinion newsletter)
# [https://samharris.substack.com/p/the-reckoning The Reckoning – ''Sam Harris'' (Substack)] (Opinion / Essay)
# Why The Media Moves in Unison – Yascha Mounk (opinion newsletter)
# [https://www.persuasion.community/p/why-the-media-moves-in-unison Why the Media Moves in Unison – ''Persuasion''] (Opinion / Essay)
# 75% of Psychology Claims Are False – Lee Jussim (opinion newsletter summarizing peer-reviewed work)
# [https://unsafescience.substack.com/p/75-of-psychology-claims-are-false 75 % of Psychology Claims Are False – ''Unsafe Science'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Replication-crisis analysis)
# The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – Washington Post opinion piece (Jeff Bezos)
# [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/28/jeff-bezos-washington-post-trust/ The Hard Truth: Americans Don’t Trust the News Media – ''The Washington Post''] (2024 Opinion / Op-Ed)
# Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – Matthew Yglesias (opinion newsletter)
# [https://www.slowboring.com/p/elite-misinformation-is-an-underrated Elite Misinformation Is an Underrated Problem – ''Slow Boring''] (Opinion / Essay)
# The Fake News About Fake News – Boston Review (magazine feature)
# [https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-fake-news-about-fake-news/ The Fake News About Fake News – ''Boston Review''] (Long-form analysis / Essay)
# How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – Jesse Singal (opinion newsletter)
# [https://jessesingal.substack.com/p/how-to-know-who-to-trust-potomac How to Know Who to Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition – ''Jesse Singal'' (Substack)] (Commentary / Media criticism)
# When The New York Times Lost Its Way – The Economist (magazine feature)
# [https://www.economist.com/1843/2023/12/14/when-the-new-york-times-lost-its-way When the New York Times Lost Its Way – ''1843 Magazine'' (''The Economist'')] (Magazine feature)
# I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – The Free Press (first-person essay)
# [https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust – ''The Free Press''] (First-person essay / Media criticism)
# Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – Steve Stewart-Williams (opinion newsletter)
# [https://www.stevestewartwilliams.com/p/should-scientific-organizations-endorse Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? – ''Steve Stewart-Williams'' (Substack)] (Commentary essay)


== Question ==
== Question ==