The Wikle

Mass Migration: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
174 edits
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
WikleBot (talk | contribs)
174 edits
m Updated page with AI-generated answer [automated edit by WikleBot]
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''
''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''


'''Causes of Mass Migration to Western Nations'''
'''Causes of mass migration to Western nations'''


* Legal-institutional openings. The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished the national-origins quota system, greatly expanding the pool of admissible migrants and privileging family reunification [4].  Canada followed with the Immigration Act of 1976, introducing a points system that explicitly encouraged skilled and humanitarian entries [5].  Australia dismantled the last vestiges of the White Australia policy between 1966 and 1973, removing racial barriers and opening the door to Asian immigration [6].
* Economic differentials. Wage gaps of five-to-one or more between the global South and North remain the single most cited reason in surveys of migrants and are documented in World Bank remittance and earnings data [7]. 
* Demographic pull. Many Western societies have ageing populations and chronically low fertility. Governments therefore look to immigration to support labour-force size, pension systems and tax bases [4][5]. 
* Political instability and conflict in sending regions. UN DESA counts a tripling of forcibly displaced persons since 2010, with most seeking refuge in richer states that can process asylum claims [8]. 
* Liberalisation of immigration law. The U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished national-origin quotas, opening the country to new source regions [4]; Canada’s 1976 Act created a points system that explicitly encouraged family unification and economic migrants [5]; Australia dismantled the White Australia Policy between 1966 and 1973, ending racial exclusions [6]. 
* Cheaper transport and instant communication allow would-be migrants to organise journeys and receive real-time labour-market information [8]. 
* Post-colonial and language ties. Former colonies often migrate to former metropoles where legal frameworks and diaspora networks already exist (e.g., Francophone Africa to France, South Asia to the UK) [8]. 
* Policy advocacy and economic modelling. Since the 1990s most mainstream economists have portrayed immigration as a net positive for GDP, influencing governments; critics such as Not On Your Team argue that these models downplayed distributional costs and cultural friction [1].


* Economic push-pull factors.  Western labour shortages, aging populations and higher wage levels attract migrants, while stagnation, conflict and demographic pressure in sending states push people outward.  Pro-migration economists have often framed this as a mutually beneficial exchange of labour and capital, though recent critics argue that many forecasts have underestimated fiscal and social costs [1].
'''Consequences of mass migration and demographic change'''


* Humanitarian norms and international obligations. Post-1945 refugee conventions, combined with domestic jurisprudence, created durable channels for asylum seekers and family-linked entrants, especially in Canada and parts of Europe [5].
Labour markets. Empirical work generally finds small aggregate wage effects but distributional shifts: low-skilled native workers may see modest downward pressure while high-skilled natives gain from complementary labour [1][7]. Critics in Military Strategy Magazine claim that large, rapid inflows can outpace integration capacity and produce zero-sum perceptions, fuelling social tension [3].


* Network effects. Each migratory wave enlarges diasporic communities, lowering both material and psychological costs for subsequent movers—an effect that economists quantify as “chain migration” [4].
Fiscal balances. In most OECD studies immigrants contribute roughly what they consume, with outcomes varying by skill level and age [7]. Opinion essays in Lorenzo from Oz argue that economists’ static models ignore long-term costs of parallel welfare systems if integration fails [2].


'''Consequences of Mass Migration and Demographic Change'''
Urban infrastructure and housing. Concentration of newcomers in gateway cities increases demand for housing and public transport, occasionally pricing out long-term residents and prompting zoning-policy debates [8].


* Demographic transformation. In the United States the foreign-born population rose from 4.7 % (1970) to about 14 % (2023), with similar rises in Canada and Australia, leading to rapid ethnic diversification of major urban centres [4] [5] [6].
Cultural and political effects. Growing diversity encourages new cuisines, arts and entrepreneurship but can also catalyse identity politics. Elections in Europe and North America show higher support for populist parties where rapid demographic change is most visible [3]. The Military Strategy article warns that mutually antagonistic identity blocs raise the theoretical risk of “clannish civil conflict” if political compromise collapses [3]; many economists dismiss this scenario as improbable [1].


* Economic gains and distributional frictions. Mainstream economic models predict modest aggregate GDP growth; however, Lorenzo from Oz contends that when externalities such as infrastructure load and capital dilution are included, net per-capita gains may vanish or turn negative [2]. Not On Your Team labels the discipline’s over-optimistic modelling “criminal intellectual negligence” [1].  In short, economists disagree on the size and distribution of benefits.
Demographics. Immigration has slowed population ageing in the United States, Canada and Australia and is now responsible for virtually all labour-force growth in those countries [4][5][6]. Long-term projections indicate that by mid-century no single ethnic group will hold an absolute majority in several Western states, a shift that drives current debates over national identity [8].


* Political realignment and polarisation. Military Strategy Magazine argues that large-scale immigration has become the “central cleavage” in domestic politics, fuelling new populist parties and, in extreme scenarios, raising the risk of intra-state conflict in Western polities [3].
Security and crime. Aggregate crime rates in the U.S., Canada and Australia continued their multi-decade decline through periods of high immigration, yet isolated terror incidents have kept security concerns in the public eye [3][8].


* Social-cultural stress.  Rapid demographic change can strain public services, amplify identity politics and provoke backlash from segments that perceive status loss.  Conversely, advocates stress enrichment through diversity and innovation; again, the literature is split [1] [2].
'''Did changing views of race influence policy?'''


* Security implications. Intelligence services report both increased transnational extremist recruitment and expanded soft-power reach through diaspora diplomacy.  The strategy literature warns that, unmanaged, such dynamics can undermine social cohesion [3].
Yes. The dismantling of explicitly racial selection systems in the 1960s-1970s stemmed from evolving norms:


'''Influence of Changing Views of Race'''
* Civil-rights era ethics. The 1965 U.S. Act was framed by President Johnson as ending “an era of discrimination” [4]. 
* Multicultural ideology. Canada’s 1971 Multiculturalism Policy and the 1976 Act re-cast diversity as a national asset rather than a threat [5]. 
* Post-colonial self-image. Australian governments rejected the White Australia Policy to align with decolonisation and regional diplomacy [6]. 


Shifts in moral and legal conceptions of race were decisive. The dismantling of the White Australia policy was rhetorically framed as repudiation of racism and alignment with new UN norms [6].  In the United States, civil-rights era ideals delegitimised national-origins quotas, allowing the 1965 Act to pass with bipartisan support [4].  Canadian legislators in 1976 explicitly rejected ethnocultural selection criteria, embracing a “multicultural identity” doctrine [5].  Thus, changing attitudes toward race were not a side-effect but a primary driver of liberalisation.
These normative shifts made racial criteria legally untenable and morally unfashionable, opening the door to large-scale, ethnically diverse immigration streams. Authors disagree on whether the ethical turn was primary (liberal view) or whether business demand for labour was the main driver with moral language as a post-hoc justification [1][2].


'''Conflicting Perspectives'''
'''Public discourse'''


* Economic optimists (mainstream neoclassical, many NGOs) emphasise aggregate growth, entrepreneurship and fiscal sustainability.
Debate is polarised. Mainstream economists and many policy makers emphasise aggregate economic gains and humanitarian obligations [4][5][7]. Counter-writers on Substack and in strategy journals criticise what they call “criminal intellectual negligence” for ignoring social cohesion, local wage impacts and potential strategic instability [1][2][3]. Both sides accuse the other of cherry-picking evidence, reflecting broader cultural divides over national identity, cosmopolitanism and the proper scope of the welfare state.


* Revisionist economists (Sources 1–2) argue that standard models omit public-goods saturation, welfare usage and downstream political risk.
'''Sources'''


* Security strategists (Source 3) prioritise stability and warn that demographic shock, when combined with identity politics, can escalate to domestic conflict scenarios.
[1] The Failure of Economists… On Migration Has Been So Bad, It May Amount to Criminal Intellectual Negligence – Not On Your Team (Substack, 2025).
 
[2] Economics: A Discipline Committing Suicide? Science, Reality and Social Decay – Lorenzo from Oz (Substack, 2025).
The debate is therefore not merely empirical but reflects differing disciplinary priors: efficiency, equity or security.
[3] Civil War Comes to the West – Military Strategy Magazine (2023). 
 
[4] Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 – Wikipedia.   
'''Public Discourse'''
[5] Canadian Immigration and Refugee Law, section “Immigration Act, 1976” – Wikipedia.   
 
[6] White Australia Policy – Wikipedia.   
Migration has moved from a technocratic topic to a salient culture-war issue.  Language once confined to fringe outlets—“replacement,” “invasion,” “open borders”—now appears in mainstream campaigns, while pro-immigration rhetoric centres on humanitarian rescue, innovation and demographic renewal.  Social media accelerates polarisation by rewarding emotive framing.  Governments oscillate between liberal commitments and ad-hoc restrictions, illustrating an unresolved tension between post-1960s universalist ideals and renewed demands for national control.
[7] World Bank. “Migration and Remittances Data,” 2023 edition. 
[8] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. International Migration 2020 Highlights.


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
# [https://www.notonyourteam.co.uk/p/the-failure-of-economists The Failure of Economists… On Migration Has Been So Bad, It May Amount to Criminal Intellectual Negligence – ''Not On Your Team, But Always Fair'' (Substack)] (2025 commentary essay / Opinion)  
# [https://www.notonyourteam.co.uk/p/the-failure-of-economists The Failure of Economists… On Migration Has Been So Bad, It May Amount to Criminal Intellectual Negligence – ''Not On Your Team, But Always Fair'' (Substack)] (2025 commentary essay / Opinion)
# [https://www.lorenzofromoz.net/p/economics-a-discipline-committing Economics: A Discipline Committing Suicide? Science, Reality and Social Decay – ''Lorenzo from Oz'' (Substack)] (2025 commentary essay / Opinion)  
# [https://www.lorenzofromoz.net/p/economics-a-discipline-committing Economics: A Discipline Committing Suicide? Science, Reality and Social Decay – ''Lorenzo from Oz'' (Substack)] (2025 commentary essay / Opinion)
# [https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/civil-war-comes-to-the-west/ Civil War Comes to the West – ''Military Strategy Magazine''] (2023 strategy-studies article)  
# [https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/civil-war-comes-to-the-west/ Civil War Comes to the West – ''Military Strategy Magazine''] (2023 strategy-studies article)
# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965 Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 – ''Wikipedia''] (Encyclopedia article on U.S. immigration-reform law)
# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_immigration_and_refugee_law#Immigration_Act,_1976
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_immigration_and_refugee_law#Immigration_Act,_1976 Canadian Immigration and Refugee Law – section “Immigration Act, 1976” – ''Wikipedia''] (Encyclopedia article / Canadian immigration-law history)
# https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy
# [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy White Australia Policy – ''Wikipedia''] (Encyclopedia article on Australia’s former restrictive-immigration policy)
x


== Question ==
== Question ==
What are the causes of mass migration to Western nations? What are the consequences of mass migration and demographic change? Did the changing views of race have any influence?
What are the causes of mass migration to Western nations? What are the consequences of mass migration and demographic change? Did the changing views of race have any influence?
Retrieved from "https://www.thewikle.com/w/Mass_Migration"