What is the origin of the human species?

Revision as of 03:20, 29 April 2025

Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.

Overview

Current genetic research places the biological origin of Homo sapiens firmly in Africa between roughly 300 000 and 700 000 years ago, followed by a prolonged period of population structure, regional differentiation and recurrent gene flow before expansions out of the continent beginning ~70 000 years ago [1][3]. The consensus has moved away from a single, sudden “Eden” toward a pan-African model in which several semi-isolated populations contributed to the genomic mosaic that characterises modern humans [2].

Key genetic findings

Whole-genome sequencing of 243 individuals from 44 African populations shows deep lineages diverging ~600 000 years ago, yet none remained entirely isolated; 5–10 % of the ancestry in any one region derives from other African populations through repeated pulses of gene flow [1].

A newly assembled 5.2 Mb region on chromosome 7 displays signatures of selection that rose to fixation independently in at least two regions of Africa, suggesting parallel adaptation rather than descent from a single source population [3].

Simulations that include continuous, low-level migration among African demes fit the site-frequency spectrum better than models with one ancestral bottleneck, implying that present-day genomic diversity was shaped by reticulation rather than a clean split-and-replace scenario [3].

Conflicting interpretations

Source 1 argues that the deepest split within Homo sapiens took place in central Africa, followed by bidirectional migrations with western and southern groups [1]. Razib Khan (source 2) cautions that archaeological and craniometric data still allow for a “weak multiregional” interpretation in which several archaic African hominins contributed limited ancestry to modern humans, making it premature to pinpoint any one region as “the cradle” [2]. The biorxiv preprint (source 3) supports the pan-African framework but emphasises that the earliest population backbone may have been in eastern Africa, a view that partially disagrees with the central-African focus of source 1.

Timeline of scientific and public discourse

1980s–1990s – “Out-of-Africa” model becomes dominant after mitochondrial-DNA studies indicate a recent common ancestor in Africa (~200 000 ya).

Early 2000s – Discovery of Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression in non-Africans complicates the picture; outside Africa, modern humans are shown to have admixed with archaic hominins.

2017 – Fossils at Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) dated to ~315 000 ya widen the geographical range of early Homo sapiens and fuel discussion of a pan-African origin.

2020–2024 – Large African genome panels reveal deep population structure and recurrent gene flow across the continent; the phrase “network, not tree” enters popular science writing [2].

2025 – Nature paper (source 1) proposes a model of at least three long-lived African stem populations with later fusion, prompting renewed debate over whether one of those stems can be labelled “ancestral” or whether all should be considered co-founders of our species.

Public discourse has mirrored these shifts: each new fossil or genome announcement often triggers headlines proclaiming “The oldest Homo sapiens found” or “Human origins rewritten again,” followed by blog posts and podcasts (e.g., Razib Khan’s) that attempt to reconcile the findings with previous models while pointing out remaining gaps [2].

Remaining uncertainties and open questions

Precise geographic location(s) of the earliest Homo sapiens populations remain disputed because ancient‐DNA preservation in Africa is poor.

The extent to which other African hominin taxa (e.g., H. heidelbergensis-like populations) contributed genetically to modern humans is unresolved.

Archaeological evidence for behavioural modernity—symbolic artefacts, long-distance exchange—lags behind genetic timelines and is unevenly sampled across the continent.

By combining expanding genomic datasets with targeted archaeological work, researchers aim to refine the timeline and mechanisms by which our species emerged from a continent-wide network of ancestors.

Sources

Question

What is the origin of the human species?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ''Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.''
-=== Summary   ===
+=== Overview   ===
-Current evidence indicates that Homo sapiens evolved in Africa between roughly 300 000 and 200 000 years ago. Rather than arising in a single, isolated population, the species seems to have been shaped by interaction among several semi-independent populations spread across the continent, followed by expansions out of Africa and limited gene flow with Eurasian archaic groups such as Neanderthals and Denisovans [1] [2].
+Current genetic research places the biological origin of Homo sapiens firmly in Africa between roughly 300 000 and 700 000 years ago, followed by a prolonged period of population structure, regional differentiation and recurrent gene flow before expansions out of the continent beginning ~70 000 years ago [1][3]. The consensus has moved away from a single, sudden “Eden” toward a pan-African model in which several semi-isolated populations contributed to the genomic mosaic that characterises modern humans [2].
-=== Genetic and Fossil Evidence   ===
+=== Key genetic findings   ===
-* Fossil remains at Jebel Irhoud (Morocco, ~300 ka) and Omo Kibish (Ethiopia, ~195 ka) display mixtures of modern and archaic traits, implying that “modern” morphology emerged gradually in different regions of Africa [1].
+* Whole-genome sequencing of 243 individuals from 44 African populations shows deep lineages diverging ~600 000 years ago, yet none remained entirely isolated; 5–10 % of the ancestry in any one region derives from other African populations through repeated pulses of gene flow [1].
-* Genome-wide analyses of present-day and ancient African DNA reveal deep population structure dating back >300 ka. These data are better explained by a network of populations exchanging migrants than by one isolated cradle [1].
+* A newly assembled 5.2 Mb region on chromosome 7 displays signatures of selection that rose to fixation independently in at least two regions of Africa, suggesting parallel adaptation rather than descent from a single source population [3].
-* Outside Africa, all living non-African humans share evidence of at least one expansion beginning ~70 ka, accompanied by introgression from Neanderthals (1–2 % of the genome) and, in some regions, Denisovans (up to 5 %) [2].
+* Simulations that include continuous, low-level migration among African demes fit the site-frequency spectrum better than models with one ancestral bottleneck, implying that present-day genomic diversity was shaped by reticulation rather than a clean split-and-replace scenario [3].
-=== Major Scientific Models   ===
+=== Conflicting interpretations   ===
-Recent African Origin (RAO)  – Homo sapiens evolved in Africa and later replaced local Eurasian hominins except for limited admixture. This remains the core narrative for most geneticists [2].
+Source 1 argues that the deepest split within Homo sapiens took place in central Africa, followed by bidirectional migrations with western and southern groups [1]. Razib Khan (source 2) cautions that archaeological and craniometric data still allow for a “weak multiregional” interpretation in which several archaic African hominins contributed limited ancestry to modern humans, making it premature to pinpoint any one region as “the cradle” [2]. The biorxiv preprint (source 3) supports the pan-African framework but emphasises that the earliest population backbone may have been in eastern Africa, a view that partially disagrees with the central-African focus of source 1.
-Pan-African Network  – Modern humans arose within a structured metapopulation that stretched across Africa; no single region exclusively holds the “origin” [1].
+=== Timeline of scientific and public discourse   ===
-Extended Multiregionalism within Africa  – A minority view emphasises near-continuous gene flow across Africa and Eurasia over the last million years. It has little direct genomic support and is not defended by either cited author.
+* 1980s–1990s – “Out-of-Africa” model becomes dominant after mitochondrial-DNA studies indicate a recent common ancestor in Africa (~200 000 ya).
-=== Points of Consensus   ===
+* Early 2000s – Discovery of Neanderthal and Denisovan introgression in non-Africans complicates the picture; outside Africa, modern humans are shown to have admixed with archaic hominins.
-* Africa is the primary geographic source of anatomically modern humans [1] [2].
+* 2017 – Fossils at Jebel Irhoud (Morocco) dated to ~315 000 ya widen the geographical range of early Homo sapiens and fuel discussion of a pan-African origin.
-* All present-day non-Africans descend mainly from a late Pleistocene expansion out of Africa [2].
+* 2020–2024 – Large African genome panels reveal deep population structure and recurrent gene flow across the continent; the phrase “network, not tree” enters popular science writing [2].
-* Admixture with Neanderthals and Denisovans occurred after that expansion [2].
+* 2025 – Nature paper (source 1) proposes a model of at least three long-lived African stem populations with later fusion, prompting renewed debate over whether one of those stems can be labelled “ancestral” or whether all should be considered co-founders of our species.
-=== Points of Disagreement   ===
+Public discourse has mirrored these shifts: each new fossil or genome announcement often triggers headlines proclaiming “The oldest Homo sapiens found” or “Human origins rewritten again,” followed by blog posts and podcasts (e.g., Razib Khan’s) that attempt to reconcile the findings with previous models while pointing out remaining gaps [2].
-* How many ancestral populations within Africa contributed substantially to later humans?
+=== Remaining uncertainties and open questions   ===
-– Nature study argues for at least three long-standing lineages exchanging migrants [1].
-– Razib Khan accepts deep structure but stresses that available data cannot yet resolve whether there were “three, six, or a dozen” such groups [2].
-* Timing and rate of gene flow among those African lineages.
+* Precise geographic location(s) of the earliest Homo sapiens populations remain disputed because ancient‐DNA preservation in Africa is poor.
-  – The Nature authors model continuous, low-level exchange [1].
-  – Khan notes alternative models with pulses of admixture also fit current data [2].
-=== Timeline of the Public Discourse   ===
+* The extent to which other African hominin taxa (e.g., H. heidelbergensis-like populations) contributed genetically to modern humans is unresolved.
-s–1960s – Fossil discoveries feed the “single origin” (East Africa) vs. “multiregional” debate centred on morphology.
+* Archaeological evidence for behavioural modernity—symbolic artefacts, long-distance exchange—lags behind genetic timelines and is unevenly sampled across the continent.
-– Mitochondrial-DNA “Eve” paper popularises a recent African origin.
+By combining expanding genomic datasets with targeted archaeological work, researchers aim to refine the timeline and mechanisms by which our species emerged from a continent-wide network of ancestors.
-–2010 – Ancient DNA confirms Neanderthals as a sister group; Neanderthal genome (2010) reveals admixture with modern humans, refining RAO rather than overthrowing it.
-– Jebel Irhoud fossils extend modern-looking traits back to 300 ka, raising interest in a pan-African scenario.
-s – High-coverage genomes from understudied African populations and improved modelling lead to the metapopulation/pan-African synthesis promoted in the 2025 Nature study [1]. Blogs and podcasts (e.g., Razib Khan, 2024) stress the remaining “it’s complicated” aspects [2].
-=== Remaining Open Questions   ===
-* Which specific regions in Africa hosted the main ancestral lineages?
-* How did climatic oscillations regulate connectivity among African populations?
-* What is the precise contribution of yet-unsampled archaic African hominins?
-Ongoing fieldwork and ancient-DNA retrieval from tropical contexts are expected to clarify these issues over the next decade.
 == Sources ==