What is the epistemic crisis?

Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.

The epistemic crisis

---

An “epistemic crisis” is a period in which large parts of the public lose confidence that existing institutions, experts, and information channels can reliably tell them what is true. Dan Williams defines it as a breakdown in the shared rules we use “to decide which claims to believe” [7], while Arnold Kling frames it as a collapse in “common knowledge” that once under-girded political and scientific debate [6]. RAND’s Truth Decay project similarly stresses the “diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life” [4].

Across surveys, trust in government, the news media, and even science has fallen to historic lows [3][5]. Replication failures in research [2] and open disagreements among experts during the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the sense that no authority can be taken at its word [6][8]. The result, according to Nate Silver, is that “the expert class is failing” and the public no longer believes that technocrats can steer society through crises [9].

Causes of the crisis

---

1. Politicization of expertise. When scientific or professional bodies take overt political stances, trust erodes—especially among those who would normally be ideologically aligned [1][16].
2. Proven elite error. High-profile mistakes (e.g., financial crisis forecasts, Iraq WMD intelligence, early COVID messaging) create feedback loops of skepticism [9][13].
3. Low reproducibility in the sciences. The large‐scale replication study in psychology found that only ~36 % of seminal results replicated, feeding popular narratives that “75 % of psychology claims are false” [2][12].
4. Fragmented media ecosystems. Cable news, social platforms, and partisan outlets flood audiences with conflicting frames, while legacy media face accusations of groupthink [13][14].
5. Cognitive overload & motivated reasoning. RAND highlights that a 24/7 information environment pushes citizens toward heuristics—trusting in-group narratives rather than weighing evidence [4].

Examples of elite failures that fueled the crisis

---

• The replication crisis. Published failures to reproduce cornerstone psychology findings undermined faith in peer review [2][12].

• COVID-19 messaging reversals. Shifts on masks, school closures, and lab-leak discourse were perceived as incompetence or bias by many commentators [6][9].

• Financial crisis of 2008. Economists, ratings agencies, and regulators failed to anticipate systemic risk, delegitimizing macroeconomic expertise [9][11].

• Iraq War intelligence (2003). Faulty assessments on weapons of mass destruction eroded trust in both intelligence services and major newspapers that uncritically amplified them [11][14].

• Media scandals. Controversies at The New York Times [14] and NPR [15] are cited as proof that newsroom cultures can become insular, ideological, or error-prone.

• Political endorsements by scientific bodies. Critics argue that when organizations such as the AMA or scientific societies endorse candidates, they appear partisan and diminish perceived neutrality [16].

Timeline of the public discourse

---

1958–1970s: Trust in U.S. federal government peaks at 73 % (1958) but starts a long decline after Vietnam and Watergate [3].

1990s: Rise of 24-hour cable news and talk radio creates segmented audiences.

2003–2008: Iraq intelligence failure and Global Financial Crisis intensify scrutiny of expert judgment.

2010–2015: Social media platforms scale. Science publishes the first large replication study, revealing systemic weaknesses in psychology [2]. RAND coins “Truth Decay” (2018) [4].

2020–2021: COVID-19 brings unprecedented reliance on expert guidance. Communication miscues and politicization deepen skepticism [5][6][9].

2023–2024: Pew reports record-low trust in scientists among many demographic groups [5]; commentators declare an “epistemic crisis” [6][7][9].

Conflicting views in the discourse

---

• Some analysts (e.g., Yglesias [11]) emphasize elite misinformation; others (Boston Review [13]) argue that the “fake news” panic itself is overstated.

• Sam Harris [10] sees the crisis largely as a problem of online disinformation, while Dan Williams [7] stresses institutional failures.

• Lee Jussim [12] portrays replication problems as evidence of widespread scientific unreliability, whereas the original Science replication paper urges incremental reform, not wholesale distrust [2].

Source Analysis

---

1. Peer-reviewed preprint (political science / psychology)
2. Peer-reviewed journal article (Science, reproducibility study)
3. Survey report (Pew Research Center)
4. Policy research report (RAND Corporation)
5. Survey report (Pew Research Center)
6. Opinion essay / commentary (Arnold Kling, Substack)
7. Opinion essay / commentary (Dan Williams, Substack)
8. Opinion essay / commentary (Dan Williams, Substack)
9. Opinion essay / commentary (Nate Silver, Substack)
10. Opinion essay / commentary (Sam Khan, Substack)
11. Opinion essay / commentary (Sam Harris, Substack)
12. Opinion essay / commentary summarizing academic literature (Lee Jussim, Substack)
13. Magazine essay / investigative journalism (Boston Review)
14. Magazine essay / investigative journalism (The Economist)
15. Opinion essay / insider account (The FP)
16. Opinion essay / commentary (Steve Stewart-Williams, Substack)

Sources

1. Study: Politicization Undermines Trust in Institutions, Even Among the Ideologically Aligned Public

2. Study: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Data-driven Analysis:

3. Public Trust in Government: 1958-2024 - Pew Research

4. Truth Decay: An Initial Exploration of the Diminishing Role of Facts and Analysis in American Public Life - RAND Corporation 5. Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline - Pew Research

Investigative Journalism & Commentary:

1. An Epistemic Crisis? - Arnold Kling
2. America's epistemological crisis - Dan Williams
3. Elite failures and populist backlash - Dan Williams
4. The expert class is failing, and so is Biden’s presidency Nate Silver
5. It's The Epistemology, Stupid - Sam Khan
6. The Reckoning - Sam Harris
7. Why The Media Moves in Unison - Yascha Mounk
8. 75% of Psychology Claims are False - Lee Jussim
9. The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media - Jeff Bezos
10. - Elite misinformation is an underrated problem - Matthew Yglesias
11. The Fake News about Fake News - The Boston Review
12. How To Know Who To Trust, Potomac Plane Crash Edition - Jess Singal
13. When the New York Times lost its way - The Economist
14. I’ve Been at NPR for 25 Years. Here’s How We Lost America’s Trust.
15. Should Scientific Organizations Endorse Political Candidates? - Steve Stewart-Williams

Question

What is the epistemic crisis? What is the cause of the epistemic crisis? What are some examples of elite failure the caused the epistemic crisis?