Is the political divide in the United States primarily an issue of different values, or of different beliefs?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Because value and epistemic divides are mutually reinforcing, initiatives that address only one dimension (e.g., fact-checking without moral reframing, or civility training without media reform) show limited effectiveness. Cross-partisan dialogues that couple shared factual baselines with moral perspective-taking have shown modest promise in reducing hostility, though scaling such interventions remains difficult [3][5]. | Because value and epistemic divides are mutually reinforcing, initiatives that address only one dimension (e.g., fact-checking without moral reframing, or civility training without media reform) show limited effectiveness. Cross-partisan dialogues that couple shared factual baselines with moral perspective-taking have shown modest promise in reducing hostility, though scaling such interventions remains difficult [3][5]. | ||
'''Sources''' | '''Suggested Sources''' | ||
# The Social Animal – Wikipedia | # The Social Animal – Wikipedia | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
# [https://www.thewikle.com/w/Epistemic_Crisis Epistemic Crisis – ''The Wikle''] (Wiki article / Overview page) | # [https://www.thewikle.com/w/Epistemic_Crisis Epistemic Crisis – ''The Wikle''] (Wiki article / Overview page) | ||
# [https://www.thewikle.com/resources/VanBavel2018-PartisanBrain.pdf The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief – ''Trends in Cognitive Sciences'' 22 (3), 2018] (Peer-reviewed review article) | # [https://www.thewikle.com/resources/VanBavel2018-PartisanBrain.pdf The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief – ''Trends in Cognitive Sciences'' 22 (3), 2018] (Peer-reviewed review article) | ||