Race Social Construct: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Update Answer from Wikle section [automated edit by WikleBot] |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Answer from Wikle == | == Answer from Wikle == | ||
Race is a complex concept that has been defined and redefined over time. According to some scholars, race is a social construct, while others argue that it has a biological basis. This argument is rooted in historical, social, and scientific contexts. | |||
Many scientists and scholars argue that race is a social construct, meaning it is not based on inherent biological differences but rather on societal norms and perceptions. They point out that genetic differences within racial groups can be greater than those between different racial groups. For instance, geneticist David Reich, in his op-ed in the New York Times, emphasizes that while genetic variations exist, they do not align with race as we understand it socially (Reich, 2018). | |||
This perspective is also supported by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). In their 1950 statement, they declare that race is a social construct, arguing that biological differences do not justify racial discrimination or hierarchy. This was influenced by the historical context of post-World War II, where the horrors of racial theories turned into deadly policies led to a shift in discourse about race (UNESCO, 2020). | |||
However, there are arguments for the biological basis of race, a position often referred to as "race realism." Race realists argue that there are measurable and significant genetic differences between different racial groups. They suggest that these differences can be used to explain disparities in health, intelligence, and behavior. This perspective is often criticized for its potential to fuel racial discrimination and prejudice (Aporia Magazine). | |||
The public discourse on race is often polarized, with strong emotions and political ideologies influencing the debate. As pointed out by Persuasion Community, the discourse often lacks nuance, with people pressured to conform to one perspective or the other. This stifles open discussion and exploration of the complexities of race (Persuasion Community). | |||
In the field of genomics, there is ongoing debate about the role of race. Some researchers argue that acknowledging racial differences can help in personalized medicine. For instance, AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging could potentially improve health outcomes. However, others worry this could perpetuate harmful stereotypes and biases (The Wikle, 2022). | |||
In conclusion, while there is a general scientific consensus that race is more of a social construct than a biological reality, the debate continues, influenced by historical, social, and scientific factors. | |||
Sources: | |||
* Reich, D. (2018). How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’. The New York Times. [Link](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/02/opinion/genes-race.html) | |||
* UNESCO (2020). Changing the Concept of Race - On UNESCO and Cultural Internationalism. [Link](https://thewikle.com/images/5/5e/Changing_the_concept_of_race_-_On_UNESCO_and_cultural_internationalism_%282020%29.pdf) | |||
* The Case for Race Realism. Aporia Magazine. [Link](https://www.aporiamagazine.com/p/the-case-for-race-realism) | |||
* Discourse on Race Has a Conformity Problem. Persuasion Community. [Link](https://www.persuasion.community/p/discourse-on-race-has-a-conformity) | |||
* AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging. The Wikle. [Link](https://thewikle.com/images/b/bd/AI_recognition_of_patient_race_in_medical_imaging_%282022%29.pdf) | |||
==Arguments for race as a social construct== | ==Arguments for race as a social construct== | ||