What is the epistemic crisis?: Difference between revisions

WikleBot (talk | contribs)
m Update Answer from Wikle section [automated edit by WikleBot]
Line 16: Line 16:
1. What is the epistemic crisis?
1. What is the epistemic crisis?


The epistemic crisis is a term used to describe the current state of knowledge and trust in established institutions, experts, and media in society. It involves a breakdown in the systems and processes by which societies establish what is known and how it is known, leading to widespread uncertainty, confusion, and mistrust. As a result, different groups within society are unable to agree on basic facts or the reliability of various information sources.
The epistemic crisis refers to a state of societal confusion and mistrust about what to believe and who to trust for reliable information. It is a crisis in determining truth and knowledge, often characterized by widespread disagreement on fundamental facts, the dissemination and acceptance of misinformation, and a general erosion of trust in traditional sources of knowledge like the media, scientific community, and government.


2. What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?
2. What is the cause of the epistemic crisis?


The epistemic crisis has multiple causes. One is the rise of social media and the internet, which has resulted in an information overload and made it easier for misinformation and disinformation to spread rapidly. Another cause is the erosion of trust in established institutions and experts, due to perceived failures and biases. Some argue that elites, including politicians, academics, and media professionals, have contributed to this crisis by failing to adequately understand or address the concerns of the public, leading to a populist backlash. There is also a sense of a "herd mentality" among the media, which is viewed as moving in unison and thus failing to provide diverse perspectives.
The causes of the epistemic crisis are multifaceted and involve both societal and institutional factors.  


3. What are some examples of elite failure?
Arnold Kling on his Substack blog points to the failure of elites and institutions in maintaining public trust and providing reliable information. Nate Silver also echoes this sentiment on his blog, highlighting the expert class's failure in various fields like economy, health, and politics contributing to people's lack of trust.


Some examples of elite failure include the 2008 financial crisis, where financial experts and regulators failed to prevent the collapse of the banking system; the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, where health experts and governments have been accused of failing to adequately prepare for or respond to the crisis; and the ongoing issue of climate change, where political and business leaders have been criticized for failing to take adequate action.  
Sam Harris's Substack blog post argues that the crisis is also fueled by the polarization of media and the rise of social media platforms that enable the spread of misinformation. The blog post by Conspicuous Cognition outlines the role of cognitive biases in fostering the crisis, as individuals are more likely to believe information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs and dismiss contradictory evidence.


However, the source authors have different views on this. For instance, Nate Silver argues that the expert class is failing because it has become overly politicized, while Sam Harris suggests that the problem lies with the public's inability to critically evaluate expert opinions. Meanwhile, Arnold Kling argues that the crisis is due to a shift in the way knowledge is produced and disseminated, from a hierarchical model based on expertise to a more egalitarian, networked model facilitated by the internet.
3. What are some examples of elite failure that caused the epistemic crisis?
 
Several examples highlight elite failures contributing to the epistemic crisis. Arnold Kling cites the 2008 financial crisis as a significant example, where economic experts failed to predict or prevent the crisis, leading to widespread distrust. Similarly, Nate Silver mentions the mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic by health experts as another instance that eroded trust.
 
The post on Persuasion Community highlights instances of media moving in unison without critical evaluation, such as the early dismissal of the lab-leak theory for COVID-19, which was later considered plausible. This kind of uncritical conformity can contribute to public mistrust.
 
The blog post on Conspicuous Cognition also mentions the populist backlash against elite failures, where perceived incompetence or corruption of political elites fuels resentment and mistrust among the populace.
 
It's important to note that these views are not universally agreed upon, and the perception of "elite failure" can be influenced by political, ideological, and personal biases.