What is the epistemic crisis?

Written by AI. Help improve this answer by adding to the sources section. When the sources section is updated this article will regenerate.

What is the “epistemic crisis”?

The phrase refers to a breakdown in shared methods for distinguishing true from false claims in public life. Commentators argue that citizens no longer agree on which institutions, experts, or procedures deserve trust, leading to fragmented “epistemic authorities” and persistent political conflict [1] [2] [5] [19]. Symptoms include decline in confidence in government, media, science and other elite institutions, a rise in mutually incompatible “information bubbles,” and growing doubt that evidence or expertise can settle controversial questions [6] [12] [18].

Causes identified in the literature

Elite performance problems. From the Iraq-WMD error to 2008 financial oversight failures, high-salience mistakes have reduced the perceived reliability of the expert class [3] [4] [10].

Media homogenization and ideological sorting. National outlets increasingly share the same cultural milieu and social networks, causing story selection and framing to move “in unison” and appear partisan to outsiders [7] [14] [15].

Reproducibility crises in science. Large replication efforts show that the majority of highly cited psychology papers do not replicate, eroding confidence in peer review and academic claims [8].

Politicization of neutral bodies. When scientific societies or newsrooms take explicit ideological stands, even co-partisans report lower trust; institutional neutrality is a fragile public good [16] [17].

Information abundance. Social media allows rapid, low-cost publication of any claim, overwhelming traditional gatekeepers and letting motivated reasoning flourish [12] [19].

Authors differ on relative weighting. Nate Silver stresses forecasting errors and institutional group-think [4]; Arnold Kling emphasizes the gulf between “expert” and “folk” epistemologies [1]; Sam Harris highlights media incentives and partisan bias that reverse the normal burden of proof [6]. Dan Williams focuses on structural elite failure and populist backlash [2] [3].

Examples of elite failures frequently cited

Iraq War intelligence (2002-03): bipartisan expert consensus on WMD proved unfounded, catalyzing general skepticism about national-security expertise [3].

Global financial crisis (2007-09): regulators, rating agencies and macro-economists missed systemic risk, undermining trust in technocratic competence [4] [10].

COVID-19 messaging (2020-21): shifting public-health guidance on masks, school closures, and lab-leak debates showcased inconsistent expert communication [4] [6] [10].

Replication crises (2010-present): large‐scale failures to reproduce landmark findings in psychology and other fields [8] have prompted questions about the broader scientific knowledge-production process.

Media reporting missteps: the “lab-leak” dismissal, Hunter Biden laptop suppression, and retracted stories at major outlets have become case studies in newsroom group-think and confirmation bias [4] [7] [14] [15].

Public discourse & timeline (selected milestones)

2003–2008: Iraq War and the financial crash spark early claims that elites are “epistemically unmoored.”

2010–2015: Academic replication projects (Open Science Collaboration, 2015) reveal widespread non-replication in psychology [8]. RAND introduces the term “Truth Decay” (2018) [19].

2016: Brexit and the U.S. election intensify discussion around “fake news” and partisan epistemologies [12].

2020: COVID-19 controversies push “epistemic crisis” into mainstream commentary; Substack essays by Kling [1] and Williams [2] synthesize the problem.

2023–2024: Investigations of media performance (Economist NYT piece [14], Free Press NPR essay [15]) and polling on collapsing trust in government and media (Pew 2024 [18]) keep the debate active. Silver’s 2024 analysis connects elite forecasting errors to declining presidential approval [4].

Conflicting views

While most authors agree that trust is falling, they dispute solutions. Kling favors decentralization of expertise [1]; Williams argues for institutional reform that re-aligns elite incentives [2]; Harris calls for stronger professional norms and transparency [6]; Silver urges humility and empirical accountability in the expert class [4]. Some, like Sam Khan, argue the crisis is overstated and primarily a matter of epistemic hygiene rather than institutional collapse [5].

Summary

The epistemic crisis refers to the erosion of shared standards for evaluating truth claims, driven by repeated elite failures, politicization of institutions, and an information environment that rewards partisanship over accuracy. Its consequences—rising polarization, distrust, and policy gridlock—continue to dominate scholarly and journalistic debate.

Sources

Question

What is the epistemic crisis? What is the cause of the epistemic crisis? What are some examples of elite failure the caused the epistemic crisis?